Why (Killout mix)

Many questions remain unanswered or at best unexplained when digesting the official story of September 11 2001. Why was Bush left exposed at the school by his staff when, for all they knew, he and the schoolchildren could have been a target? Why has he claimed on at least two separate occasions to have seen the first plane strike the tower as it happened? Why were no jets scrambled from neighbouring airforce bases? Why was the steel from the buildings shipped out of the country and melted down before being analysed? And that’s just scratching the surface.

We wondered about all the anomalies and inconsistencies in the official versions of events as reported by the MSM and put together this track, unsurprisingly titled Why.

The usual suspects

As with most recent ‘terror’ acts, the governments and media are quick to blame Arab nations or fundamentalists, despite there being largely circumstantial evidence (e.g. a passport that flew intact out of the pocket of a hijacker engulfed in a fireball, and then landed a few blocks from the WTC while the black boxes were supposedly destroyed beyond salvage).

Meanwhile, when questions are raised, our so-called elect sidestep the issues or change their story rather than present solid facts. The “conspiracy nuts” – as the MSM label us – would not have half the reasons to doubt our governments if the official versions of events held more than a teaspoon of water, or TPTB confronted the questions instead of preferring silence.

Call us radical, but when somebody asks us to believe in something “because I say so”, we think a reasonable question is to ask Why.